The controversial Chinese ship, the An Yue Yang, which is bearing 77 tonnes of arms and weapons destined for Zimbabwe, set sail from Durban without refuelling. When the vessel was reported as a casualty yesterday morning (GMT+2), it confirmed Jasa’s (Justice Alliance of South Africa) suspicions that the An Ye Jiang had insufficient fuel to reach its destination: Luanda, Angola.
Navy sources said that although the ship switched off its transponder when it left the harbour, it was being tracked via satellite by the South African Navy, the South African Police Services, Interpol and other international intelligence organisations. The navy did not wish to comment on the exact location of the An Ye Jiang at that time. (Source: Beeld)
A rough calculation based on a sea speed of approximately 30km/h, would have taken the ship to Luanda by Tuesday evening. Assuming that it had indeed sailed towards Luanda, the ship will have been located somewhere between Port Elizabeth and Cape Town when it (perhaps ran out of fuel, and) was added to the register.
Now, somewhere between midnight and 8am (GMT+2) today, the controversial arms ship was removed from the Lloyds MIU Vessel Casualty register.
There are only two possible reasons for this: The ship may have been clandestinely refuelled during the night or it may have been intercepted by the Navy. If the latter holds true, the ship could be escorted to one of the commercial harbours or, considering the controversies surrounding the vessel, it may even be taken into a naval harbour instead.
Until the Navy decides to offer further information, all we can do is wait.
Filed under: Africa, An Ye Jiang, Angola, China, Election, INTERPOL, Lloyds, Navy, Robert Mugabe, South Africa, Zimbabwe, arms, mugabe, politics, weapons | Tagged: Ammunition, Angola, arms, China, elections, INTERPOL, Lloyds, Navy, politics, Robert Mugabe, Ship, South Africa, weapons, Zimbabwe
We never stated that the vessel sank.
We called it a casualty as it failed to discharge its cargo in the manner it expected. This is normal practice for us as we supply a lot of data to the insurance market and this type of information is of use to them.
We currently have no knowledge of the vessel being refuelled/bunkered or being detained by any navy.
Hello Mark,
Your comment, as well as the relevant detail, are now published as promised.
Thank you for the feedback.
[...] on the Lloyd’s List casualty register – according to blogger “Word Wright”, the vessel was removed from the register this morning, suggesting that it was either refueled at sea or intercepted by the South African [...]